Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Edit vigiles specifications that generate CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md instruction files.
Edit a vigiles .spec.ts to change a compiled instruction file (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md) — add, modify, or remove a rule, section, command, or key file. Use whenever you need to change a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md that carries a vigiles hash (edit the spec, never the artifact), including adding a new enforce()/check()/guidance() rule.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
Edit a `.spec.ts` file to update the project's instruction files. The spec is the source of truth — CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md are compiled build artifacts that must not be edited directly.
## Arguments
$ARGUMENTS — What the user wants to change. Examples:
- "add a rule about always using the custom logger"
- "update the architecture section"
- "add src/services/auth.ts to key files"
- "add npm run lint to commands"
- "change the testing guidance"
## Instructions
### Step 1: Find the Spec
Look for spec files in the repo root:
- `CLAUDE.md.spec.ts` — source for CLAUDE.md
- `AGENTS.md.spec.ts` — source for AGENTS.md
- Any `*.spec.ts` matching instruction files
If no spec exists: if there's a hand-written `CLAUDE.md`, suggest the
`adopt-spec` skill; otherwise suggest `npx vigiles init` to scaffold one.
### Step 2: Read and Understand the Spec
Read the spec file. It's a TypeScript file that exports a `claude()` call with these fields:
```typescript
import { claude, enforce, guidance, check, every } from "vigiles/spec";
export default claude({
// Optional: output target (defaults to "CLAUDE.md")
target: "CLAUDE.md",
// or multi-target:
// target: ["CLAUDE.md", "AGENTS.md"],
// Prose sections — become ## headings in compiled output
sections: {
positioning: "What this project does...",
architecture: "How the codebase is structured...",
},
// File paths verified to exist at compile time
keyFiles: {
"src/index.ts": "Main entry point",
},
// Commands verified against package.json
commands: {
"npm run build": "Compile the project",
"npm test": "Run all tests",
},
// Rules — three types
rules: {
// enforce() — backed by a linter rule, verified to exist AND be enabled
"no-any": enforce(
"@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any",
"Use unknown and narrow with type guards.",
),
// check() — filesystem assertion run by vigiles
"test-pairing": check(
every("src/**/*.service.ts").has("{name}.test.ts"),
"Every service must have tests.",
),
// guidance() — prose only, no enforcement
"research-first": guidance("Google unfamiliar APIs before implementing."),
},
});
```
### Step 3: Make the Changes
Based on what the user asked for:
**Adding a rule** (this absorbs the old `generate-rule` skill):
- **Classify the rule** from the request:
- `enforce()` — a linter rule can back it. Check the project's linter configs
(ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) for a matching rule; also
consider an architectural tool (ast-grep, Dependency Cruiser, Steiger). If
uncertain whether a rule exists, **ask the user** rather than guessing.
- `check()` — a filesystem structural convention ("every X needs a Y"). Only
for file-pairing; never for code content.
- `guidance()` — can't be mechanically enforced (subjective conventions,
process rules, migration context).
- For `enforce()`: use the real linter rule name (e.g. `eslint/no-console`,
`@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any`, `ruff/T201`).
- Add to the `rules` object with a kebab-case key derived from the intent,
preserving alphabetical order if the existing rules are alphabetical. Import
any new builders needed (e.g. `check` and `every` for the first `check()`).
**Updating a section:**
- Edit the string in `sections`. Sections are plain strings or tagged template literals with `file()`, `cmd()`, `ref()` for verified references
- Do NOT add `#` or `##` headers inside sections — they break the document structure
**Adding a key file or command:**
- Add to `keyFiles` or `commands`. The compiler verifies these exist at compile time
- For commands: must match a script in `package.json`
- For key files: must exist on disk
- 🔴 **KEEP THE DESCRIPTION TO ONE LINE — aim for 120 characters, never exceed
~200.** A `keyFiles` entry is a POINTER: what the file is for, so a reader knows
whether to open it. The explanation of how it works belongs in that file's own
header comment, where it is read when someone is actually in the file. An
instruction file is loaded on EVERY request, so a paragraph here is paid for
every turn, forever, by every reader — including the ones who never touch that
file.
- **This list only ever grows unless you shrink it.** Every session adds entries
and none removes them, so before adding, check whether a NEARBY entry is now
stale (the file moved, the role changed, the description restates its header)
and fix it in the same edit. Adding without ever pruning is how an instruction
file reaches four times its harness's budget — `vigiles audit` reports that
number as `Always-loaded instructions`, so check it when you touch this list.
### Step 4: Compile
After editing the spec, run:
```bash
npx vigiles compile
```
This regenerates the compiled instruction file(s). Review the output for any errors:
- `stale-file` — a key file path doesn't exist
- `stale-command` — a command isn't in package.json
- `invalid-rule` — a linter rule doesn't exist or is disabled
- `section-has-header` — a section contains `#` headers (break into separate named sections)
### Step 5: Verify
```bash
npx vigiles lint
```
If the vigiles plugin is installed (`/plugin marketplace add zernie/vigiles` then `/plugin install vigiles@vigiles`, or `npx vigiles init`), the PostToolUse hook recompiles automatically after you save the spec.
## Important
- **Do what's asked; don't silently escalate enforcement.** Add the rule the user asked for. If making it an `enforce()` would need a linter-config edit or a plugin install (a cost), or if it could fail a clean CI, **say so and let the user choose** — don't change linter config or flip on strict / `workflow` gating on your own. A pure win (a rule that's already enabled) you can just apply. The `strengthen` skill owns `guidance()` → `enforce()` upgrades.
- **Never edit CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md directly** — they have a vigiles hash comment and are build artifacts
- **The spec is TypeScript** — you get type checking, autocomplete, and verified references
- **`enforce()` rules are verified** — the compiler checks the rule exists AND is enabled in your linter config
- **Sections must not contain `#` or `##` headers** — use separate named sections instead