SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Never Block on the Human The human supervises asynchronously. Agents must stay unblocked: make reasonable decisions, proceed, and let the human course-correct after the fact. Code is cheap. Waiting is expensive. **Why:** Every permission pause stalls the pipeline and makes the human the bottleneck. Since code changes are reversible and reviewable, a wrong decision usually costs less than blocking. **Pattern:** - **Proceed, then present.** Do the work, show the result. Don't ask "should I do X?" Do X, explain why. - **Reserve questions for genuine ambiguity.** Ask only when you truly cannot infer intent from context. - **Make the system self-healing.** When you notice a problem, log it and fix it in the next round. - **Supervision is async.** The human reviews plans, diffs, and changes on their own schedule. Design workflows for review-after-the-fact. - **Code is cheap, attention is scarce.** A wrong implementation costs minutes to fix. A blocked agent costs the human's attention to unblock. **Boundaries:** - **Irreversible actions** (force-push, delete production data, send external messages) still require confirmation. - **Reversible actions** (write code, edit notes, split tasks) should proceed without blocking. - **Product direction** comes from the human; *execution* should not block.