SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Deobfuscates malicious JavaScript from droppers, web pages, and HTA/scriptlets: unrolling string-array and char-code encodings, resolving eval/Function chains, and statically recovering payloads and URLs without executing untrusted code. Activates for requests to deobfuscate JavaScript, decode obfuscated JS, or analyze a malicious script dropper.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Deobfuscating Malicious JavaScript ## When to Use - You have obfuscated JS (from a phishing page, HTA, `.js` dropper, or scriptlet) and need its real behavior. - You must recover hidden URLs, dropped commands, or a next-stage payload. - You want to statically unroll common obfuscation rather than run untrusted code. **Do not use** a real browser or `node` to execute the script for analysis — that runs the malware. Use a sandboxed interpreter (box-js) or static transformation only. ## Prerequisites - A safe analysis approach: static decoding, or a JS malware sandbox (box-js) in the lab. - Familiarity with common obfuscation: string arrays, `String.fromCharCode`, hex/unicode escapes, `eval`/`Function` chains, packers. ## Safety & Handling - Treat the script as live code; never execute it outside an isolated sandbox. - Defang recovered URLs and store dropped payloads password-protected. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Normalize and de-pack Pretty-print the source and identify the obfuscation style (array-shuffle, eval-packer, charcode). Decode static encodings first: hex/unicode escapes and base64 literals. ```bash python scripts/analyst.py decode dropper.js ``` ### Step 2: Unroll string arrays and char-code builds Reconstruct strings built from arrays/`fromCharCode`/concatenation to reveal API names, URLs, and commands. ### Step 3: Resolve eval/Function indirection — safely Replace `eval`/`new Function` with logging (or a sandbox) so the constructed code is captured as *data*, not executed, then recurse on the recovered layer. ### Step 4: Extract behavior and IOCs Identify the dropper actions (WScript.Shell, ActiveX, fetch/XHR), recover URLs and dropped paths, defang, and route payloads onward. ## Validation - Static encodings (hex/unicode/base64) are fully decoded. - String-array/charcode constructions are unrolled to readable strings. - `eval`/`Function` layers are captured as data and recursed, with no untrusted execution. ## Pitfalls - Running the script to "see what it does" and infecting the analysis host. - Stopping at one layer when the dropper nests several. - Missing environment-keyed branches (only acts on certain dates/locales) during static review. ## References - See [`references/api-reference.md`](references/api-reference.md) for the static JS decoder. - ECMAScript spec and box-js (linked in frontmatter).