skilly. Buy ad slot
All skills
Machine Learning · Testing / AGENT SKILL

minimal-run-and-audit

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
450.1K installs 495 GitHub stars
0

Capture standardized evidence from documented deep learning smoke tests, inference, or evaluation runs.
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.

Low community score

minimal-run-and-audit: This skill has a community score below −5, meaning it has received more downvotes than upvotes. Review its source and assessment before installing. Community votes are not a security review.

BEFORE YOU INSTALL

Understand the trade-offs.

SECURITY REVIEW

Not yet assessed

Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.

No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.

SKILL QUALITY

Not yet assessed

How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.

No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.

The full skill.

Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md

# minimal-run-and-audit

Use this as the Rigor Run skill. The installed slug remains
`minimal-run-and-audit` for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in
`../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md`; this skill should make run
evidence auditable without turning every command into a rigid protocol.

## When to apply

- After a reproduction target and setup plan exist.
- When the main skill needs execution evidence and normalized outputs.
- When a smoke test, documented inference run, documented evaluation run, or other short non-training verification is appropriate.
- When the user already knows what command should be attempted and wants execution plus reporting only.

## When not to apply

- During initial repo scanning.
- When environment or assets are still undefined enough to make execution meaningless.
- When the task is a literature lookup rather than repository execution.
- When the user is still deciding which reproduction target should count as the main run.

## Clear boundaries

- This skill owns normalized reporting for an attempted command.
- It may receive execution evidence from the main skill or a thin helper.
- It does not choose the overall target on its own.
- It does not perform broad paper analysis.
- It does not own training startup, resume, or long-running training state.
- It should not normalize risky code edits into acceptable practice.
- It must not hide changes that alter evaluation, preprocessing, checkpoints,
  metrics, or other scientific meaning.

## Input expectations

- selected reproduction goal
- runnable commands or smoke commands
- environment and asset assumptions
- optional patch metadata

## Output expectations

- execution result summary
- standardized `repro_outputs/` files
- `SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md` for changed scientific meaning and evidence status
- `COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md` for README/paper/baseline comparability
- clear distinction between verified, partial, and blocked states
- `PATCHES.md` when repo files changed

## Notes

Use `references/reporting-policy.md`, `../ai-research-reproduction/references/research-rigor-principles.md`, `scripts/run_command.py`, and `scripts/write_outputs.py`.

Skill folder

Files included alongside SKILL.md in the publisher’s repository.