SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Turn an ML research paper into a complete runnable repository through staged planning, analysis, and coding.
Convert an ML research paper into a complete, runnable code repository. 3-stage pipeline from Paper2Code — Planning (UML + dependency graph) → Analysis (per-file logic) → Coding (dependency-ordered generation). Use for reproducing paper methods.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Paper to Code Convert a research paper into a complete, runnable code repository. ## Input - `$0` — Paper PDF path, paper text, or paper URL ## References - Paper2Code prompts (planning, analysis, coding stages): `~/.claude/skills/paper-to-code/references/paper-to-code-prompts.md` ## Workflow (from Paper2Code) ### Stage 1: Planning Four-turn conversation to create a comprehensive plan: 1. **Overall Plan**: Extract methodology, experiments, datasets, hyperparameters, evaluation metrics 2. **Architecture Design**: Generate file list, Mermaid classDiagram, sequenceDiagram 3. **Task Breakdown**: Logic analysis per file, dependency-ordered task list, required packages 4. **Configuration**: Extract training details into `config.yaml` ### Stage 2: Analysis For each file in the task list (dependency order): 1. Conduct detailed logic analysis 2. Map paper methodology to code structure 3. Reference the config.yaml for all settings 4. Follow the UML class diagram interfaces strictly ### Stage 3: Coding For each file in dependency order: 1. Generate code with access to all previously generated files 2. Follow the design's data structures and interfaces exactly 3. Reference config.yaml — never fabricate configuration values 4. Write complete code — no TODOs or placeholders ### Stage 4: Debugging (if needed) If execution fails: 1. Collect error messages 2. Identify root cause using SEARCH/REPLACE diff format 3. Apply minimal fixes preserving original intent 4. Re-run until successful ## Output Structure ``` reproduced_code/ ├── config.yaml # Training configuration ├── main.py # Entry point ├── model.py # Model architecture ├── dataset_loader.py # Data loading ├── trainer.py # Training loop ├── evaluation.py # Metrics and evaluation ├── reproduce.sh # Run script └── requirements.txt # Dependencies ``` ## Key Constraints - **Dependency order**: Each file is generated with access to all previously generated files - **Interface contracts**: Mermaid diagrams serve as rigid interface definitions across all stages - **No fabrication**: Only use configurations explicitly stated in the paper - **Complete code**: Every function must be fully implemented ## Rules - Follow the paper's methodology exactly — do not invent improvements - Generate code in dependency order (data loading → model → training → evaluation → main) - Use config.yaml for all hyperparameters and settings - Every class/method in UML diagram must exist in code - Generate a reproduce.sh script for one-command execution - If paper details are ambiguous, note them explicitly ## Related Skills - Upstream: [literature-search](../literature-search/) - Downstream: [experiment-code](../experiment-code/) - See also: [code-debugging](../code-debugging/), [algorithm-design](../algorithm-design/)