Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Explain DevOps Center test failures and code violations with prioritized remediation guidance.
Analyzes DevOps Center test failures and Code Analyzer violations in plain language — failure category, offending file/class/method/line, rule violated, fix direction, and prioritized improvement suggestions (test-code vs production-code) — then optionally creates a tracked fix WorkItem on explicit request. Analysis is pure reasoning; work-item creation is a confirmation-gated write. Use this skill to explain failures or improvement suggestions, translate Code Analyzer violations, or track a fix as a work item. TRIGGER when: a run failed and the user wants root cause; a quality gate failure needs explaining; violations need translating; the user shares a failure payload and asks how to address it; wants to strengthen tests; or wants to create a fix work item, log a remediation, or assign a failure. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user wants fix code written (use platform-apex-generate) or new test classes authored (use platform-apex-test-generate).
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Analyze DevOps Center Test Failures Parses a test failure or Code Analyzer violation payload, explains it in plain language, produces prioritized improvement suggestions, and — only on explicit user request — creates a tracked fix work item. Parts 1–2 are pure reasoning (no writes); Part 3 is an optional, confirmation-gated write. **Never expose raw JSON, stack traces, or internal Salesforce error codes to the user.** Always translate to file name, method, line, and plain description. --- ## Prerequisites - **Parts 1–2 (analysis):** If the failure payload is already in context, no prerequisites are needed — this is pure reasoning. If you must fetch the payload yourself, run prerequisites (`references/prerequisite-checks.md`, Prereqs 1–4) and obtain the execution result via `dx-devops-test-suite-run` (its polling step). - **Part 3 (work item):** Run Prerequisites 1–4. You also need a `DevopsProjectId` to file under and an `OwnerId` (assignee). See `references/work-item-creation.md`. --- ## Part 1 — Classify and explain each failure Determine the failure category, then for each failure extract and translate to plain language: offending file/class, method, line number, the rule or assertion violated, and a fix direction (without writing code). Group failures by category if more than one. | Category | Description | |---|---| | Assertion failure | A test assertion failed (expected vs actual mismatch) | | Exception | An unhandled exception was thrown | | Code Analyzer violation | A static-analysis rule was violated (e.g. `ApexCRUDViolation`) | | Timeout | Test exceeded execution time limit | | Compile error | Class failed to compile | **Output format:** ```text Test failure summary: <N> failure(s) found: 1. [<Category>] `<ClassName>.cls` — `<methodName>()` at line <N> What happened: <plain-language description> Rule violated: <ruleName or assertion description> Fix direction: <plain-language suggestion> ``` Full category/pattern tables and Code Analyzer rule translations: `references/failure-categories.md` and `references/code-analyzer-violations.md`. **Empty / no-data case:** If the payload contains no failures or violations, report that clearly (e.g. "No failures found in the provided execution results.") and stop. Do NOT fabricate failures or suggestions. --- ## Part 2 — Improvement suggestions Run this **after execution completes with failures**, not on static source. For each failed test, reason over the failure message (the primary signal) to identify what the test is not handling, then produce a specific, actionable suggestion and a **fix location** (Test vs Production code). The full failure-pattern → suggestion mapping is in `references/failure-categories.md`. ```text Test improvement suggestions based on execution results: `<testMethodName>()` — [Assertion Failure / Exception / etc.] Failure: "<failure message>" What this reveals: <plain-language explanation> Suggestion: <specific, actionable recommendation> Fix location: Test | Production code Overall: <N> improvement(s) across <M> failed test(s). ``` Do not rewrite the test — only describe what needs to change and why. **Fix location: Production code** indicates a code defect exposed by a sound test (track separately, not a test-quality blocker). **Fix location: Test** indicates the test needs hardening (setup, assertions, edge cases). --- ## Part 3 — Create a fix work item (optional, on request only) Trigger only when the user wants to create a fix work item, log a remediation, or assign a failure to a developer. This is a **write** operation with a mandatory confirmation gate. Follow `references/work-item-creation.md` for inputs, the subject/assignee/project confirmation gate, the `sf data create record --sobject WorkItem` call, and error handling. > Use `WorkItem` (no namespace) — `DevopsWorkItem` is not a supported sObject in this org version. If no `DevopsProject` exists in the org, report that the work item cannot be created until a project is set up — do NOT fabricate a project or proceed. --- ## Related skills - **`dx-devops-test-suite-run`** — produces the failure payload (via its polling step) that feeds this skill. - **`dx-devops-test-suite-assignments-configure`** — assign/strengthen the suites whose tests are failing. - **`platform-apex-generate` / `platform-apex-test-generate`** — to actually write fix code or new test classes (out of scope here).