SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Research · Business / AGENT SKILL
interview-signal-synthesis
0
Synthesize interviews into themes, contradictions, opportunities, and product implications.
Understand the trade-offs.
SKILL QUALITY
Not yet assessed
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
The full skill.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Interview Signal Synthesis Transform raw interview transcripts into a structured synthesis document that surfaces themes, pain points, and actionable insights. ## Required Inputs Ask the user for these if not provided: - **Interview transcripts or notes** (even rough notes work) - **Number of participants and their profiles** (role, company size, context) - **Research questions** (what was the study trying to answer?) - **Date range** of research (for context) ## Process 1. Read all provided transcripts fully before drawing conclusions 2. Identify recurring themes (minimum 3 mentions to qualify as a theme) 3. Categorize findings into: Pain Points, Workflow Insights, Feature Requests, Delight Moments 4. Select 2-3 verbatim quotes per theme that best represent the pattern 5. Draft "So What" implications for each theme - what does this mean for the product? 6. **Validate** - Confirm every theme has quotes from at least 3 participants. Flag any insight resting on fewer as low-confidence. ## Output Structure ### Research Synthesis: [Study Name] **Participants:** [n] **Date Range:** [dates] **Research Questions:** [list] #### Theme 1: [Theme Name] - Summary (2-3 sentences) - Supporting quotes (from at least 3 participants) - Implication for product [Repeat for each theme] #### Low-Confidence Signals (1-2 participants only) [Findings worth tracking but not acting on yet - note what further research would confirm or deny] #### Recommended Next Steps [Specific, actionable recommendations based on findings] ## Quality Checks - [ ] Every theme is supported by quotes from at least 3 participants - [ ] Implications connect to specific product decisions, not just observations - [ ] Researcher bias check: no leading language, findings don't all support one hypothesis - [ ] Single-source signals are flagged separately, not mixed into main themes - [ ] Research questions from the study brief are each addressed (even if the answer is "inconclusive")