SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Use three parallel reviewers to extract transcript lessons and turn them into edits to existing skills.
Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Reflect Mine the current conversation for durable learnings, then route them into skill edits. ## When to invoke Invoke when the user says "reflect" or "/reflect". Skip when the conversation is trivial, off-topic, or already covered by an existing skill the parent followed correctly. One-offs are not learnings. ## Process ### 1. Locate the active transcript The parent finds its own transcript file before fanning out. The system prompt names the active workspace's `agent-transcripts/` directory. Use that path. Do not glob across `~/.cursor/projects/*/`. That crosses workspace boundaries and reads private chats from unrelated projects. ```bash ls -t <agent-transcripts>/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/subagents/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -10 ``` Three transcript layouts: legacy flat (`<id>.jsonl`), current nested (`<id>/<id>.jsonl`), and subagent (`<parent>/subagents/<child>.jsonl`). For each candidate, read the first JSONL line and check that `message.content[0].text` contains the conversation's opening user prompt. Take the matching path. If no path resolves, write a tight digest of the session and pass that instead. ### 2. Spawn three reviewers in parallel One message, three `Task` calls, `subagent_type: generalPurpose`, with `model` set as below, agent mode (`readonly: false`). Reviewers need MCP access for context lookups (tickets, chat threads, observability traces referenced in the transcript). Readonly strips MCPs. Each reviewer and the synthesizer name a role line in the `pstack-models.mdc` rule and a default. Set `model` to that line's value, or to the default if the rule or the line is missing. Leave `model` unset when the value is `auto` or `inherit-parent`. If the Task tool rejects a slug, use the default and say so. If it rejects the default, use the closest valid slug of the same family from its error message. | Lens | Role line | Default `model` | Prompt template | |---|---|---|---| | Judgment | `reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer` | `claude-opus-5-5-max` | `references/judgment-reviewer.md` | | Tooling | `reflect tooling` | `gpt-5.6-sol-max` | `references/tooling-reviewer.md` | | Divergent | `reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer` | `claude-opus-5-5-max` | `references/divergent-reviewer.md` | Pass each template verbatim, substituting the transcript path or digest where marked. Reviewers return findings in the `Task` response body. ### 3. Synthesize One `Task` call, `subagent_type: generalPurpose`, with `model` from the `reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer` line (default `claude-opus-5-5-max`), agent mode (`readonly: false`). The synthesizer's quality check includes spot-verifying citations, which can require MCP access. Readonly strips MCPs. Use `references/synthesizer.md` verbatim, with each reviewer's full output inlined where marked. The synthesizer returns a structured Accepted / Rejected / Backlog list. ### 4. Structural enforcement check Sanity-check the synthesizer's Accepted list. For any item that would be enforced more reliably by a lint rule, script, metadata flag, or runtime check, move it from Accepted to Backlog. See the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill. ### 5. Apply Before applying any Accepted edit, present the synthesizer's full Accepted/Rejected/Backlog output to the user and wait for explicit approval. The user picks which subset to apply and may redirect routings. Skill changes affect every future agent in the org. Do not auto-apply. Backlog items file to whatever devex / backlog tracker your team uses automatically. Only the Accepted list waits for approval. For each approved Accepted item, follow the Routing field exactly: - Trivial existing-skill edit (a one-line bullet, a tightened sentence, a stale fact corrected): parent does directly. - Substantive existing-skill edit (a new section, a new pattern table, more than ~10 lines): hand to Cursor's built-in `create-skill` skill and run its draft / test / iterate loop. - `tune description: <skill path>` (the skill exists but didn't trigger when it should have): hand to `create-skill` and run its description-optimization loop. - `new skill via create-skill: <kebab-name>`: hand creation to `create-skill`. Do not invent the shape ad hoc. If your environment ships a SKILL.md validator, run it on every touched skill before declaring done. Skip this step if it doesn't. ### 6. Summarize for the user Short list, no preamble: - Edits applied: `<skill path>`. What changed, one line each. - New skills created: `<skill path>`. One line each (rare). - Backlog filed to the devex tracker: `<issue title>` (`<tags>`). One line each. - Dropped: one line per rejected finding + reason from the synthesizer.