SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Explain subsystem architecture, runtime flow, and code ownership or layering decisions.
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Use why for motivation.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# How Explore the codebase to answer "how does X work?" questions. Produce architectural explanations at the level of a senior engineer onboarding onto a subsystem, enough to build a working mental model, not so much that it reads like annotated source code. Each spawn below names a role line in the `pstack-models.mdc` rule and a default. Set `model` to that line's value, or to the default if the rule or the line is missing. Leave `model` unset when the value is `auto` or `inherit-parent`. If the Task tool rejects a slug, use the default and say so. If it rejects the default, use the closest valid slug of the same family from its error message. ## Step 1. Assess Complexity If the scope is ambiguous, state your interpretation and explore. The user can redirect. - **Simple** (a single module, a small utility, a narrow question such as "how does function X work"): no explorers. One explainer explores and explains in a single pass. Go to Step 2b. - **Complex** (a subsystem spanning multiple files or services, a cross-cutting feature, a full architectural overview): spawn parallel explorers first, then hand off to the explainer. Go to Step 2a. When in doubt, take the simple path. ## Step 2a. Explore (complex questions only) Decompose the question into 2 to 4 exploration angles, each a distinct slice of the subsystem. Spawn all explorers in a single message: - `subagent_type`: `generalPurpose` - `model`: the `how explorer` line, default `grok-4.7-xhigh-fast` - `readonly`: `true` Each explorer gets the prompt in `references/explorer-prompt.md` with its angle filled in. Then go to Step 3. ## Step 2b. Direct Explain (simple questions) Spawn one Task subagent that explores and explains in one pass: - `subagent_type`: `generalPurpose` - `model`: the `how explainer` line, default `claude-opus-5-5-max` - `readonly`: `true` Build its prompt from `references/explainer-prompt.md` without the explorer-findings section. Go to Step 4. ## Step 3. Synthesize (complex questions only) Once all explorers have returned, spawn one Task subagent to synthesize their findings into one explanation: - `subagent_type`: `generalPurpose` - `model`: the `how explainer` line, default `claude-opus-5-5-max` - `readonly`: `true` Build its prompt from `references/explainer-prompt.md` with every explorer's findings filled in. ## Step 4. Present Present the explainer's output to the user. Light edits for clarity or context from the conversation are fine. Do not substantially rewrite it. ## Output Format The explanation uses the sections defined in `references/explainer-prompt.md`, dropping any that do not apply: Overview, Key Concepts, How It Works, Where Things Live, Gotchas.