SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Use when applying facts from .github/instructions/ to confirm those facts still match the current codebase before acting on them. Prevents errors from stale architecture instructi…
Use when applying facts from .github/instructions/ to confirm those facts still match the current codebase before acting on them. Prevents errors from stale architecture instructions.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
Validate that facts from `.github/instructions/` still match the codebase before applying them. Prevents errors from outdated instruction content. ## When to Use Load this skill at the start of any task where you: - Apply a pattern or architecture fact from `.github/instructions/` - Reference a specific file, function, or component from an instruction file - Use a previously recorded API contract, state shape, or service boundary ## Constraints - Do not skip verification to save time. A 5-second check prevents a 30-minute repair loop. - Do not assume memory is correct just because it was recently written. - Do not flag a memory as stale based on superficial differences (e.g., minor rename). Verify the semantic meaning is unchanged. ## Approach For each memory claim being applied: 1. **Locate the reference** — Find the exact file, function, or component the memory describes. 2. **Verify existence** — Confirm the file/function/component still exists at the recorded path. 3. **Verify semantics** — Confirm the described behavior, contract, or shape still matches the current code. 4. **Check for recent changes** — Look for co-located test changes or updated type definitions that suggest a refactor. 5. **Classify the memory:** - ✅ **Valid** — Still accurate. Apply it. - ⚠️ **Stale** — No longer matches the current code. Do not apply. Record the discrepancy. - ❓ **Uncertain** — Partial match or ambiguous. Verify manually before applying. 6. **Update if stale** — Write a correction to the relevant `.github/instructions/*.instructions.md` file with current facts before proceeding. ## Output Format For each verified memory: - Memory claim: `<what the memory states>` - Verification result: ✅ Valid / ⚠️ Stale / ❓ Uncertain - Discrepancy (if stale): `<what has changed>` - Action taken: Applied / Skipped / Updated