SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Use for ShipQ state recovery, handoff, or tasks including reviews that depend on runtime, deployment, protected-data, or authorization boundaries.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# ShipQ Lifecycle Harness Use this adapter only when current ShipQ work needs governed lifecycle state: state recovery or handoff, a real source-to-runtime/deployment transition, or an authorization/protected-data boundary. A mention of Gmail, runtime, demo, pricing, or a workbook does not trigger it by itself. Questions, scoped edits, and reviews that do not depend on these boundaries start from their target files, callers, and tests without lifecycle routing. ## Startup - Reuse the applicable `AGENTS.md` already in context unless it is missing or may have changed. Its `Read First` table owns task-specific reading. - Apply its `Authorization Levels` before any governed operation. - Before edits, check current worktree state and preserve user-owned changes. - Read only the facts, policy, and latest state needed for the boundary being crossed. For recovery or handoff, use the relevant entries in `docs/designs/harness-state.md`. For workbook/runtime contract work, read the applicable handoff or canonical-schema source named by `AGENTS.md`. - Missing required state is a blocker for the dependent operation. Do not create or reconstruct it without matching write authority. Classify the request only far enough to choose the next applicable workflow. Use product or engineering planning for unresolved decisions, investigation for observed failures, browser QA for real UI evidence, security review for trust boundaries, and release workflows only when the user requests release work. Concrete implementation with clear acceptance criteria proceeds directly under the repository rules. Follow `AGENTS.md` for any subagent routing. Delegation does not widen write scope or permit commit, push, deploy, remote, or shared-runtime operations. ## Hard Gates For workbook/runtime/demo work: - Do not expose `API USER ID`, raw workbook rows, `source_row`, `raw_header`, `component_trace`, customer group details, tier details, or internal generated artifacts through public surfaces. - Do not mutate `data/internal/shipq_quote_demo.sqlite` without explicit runtime replacement approval and rollback evidence. - Keep `Tariff calulator` reference-only; it must not feed runtime calculation. - Use `/tmp/shipq-workbook-runtime-smoke.sqlite` for finalize smoke by default. ## Verification Use ShipQ `AGENTS.md` as the single verification authority. Run its narrowest applicable focused gate during iteration and its final gate only when required. Do not add a second full pytest, repeat tests already included by a harness, or rerun valid evidence when its inputs and environment have not changed. Keep evidence lanes distinct: source checks do not prove runtime activity, deployment, live Gmail/provider behavior, or customer acceptance. Completion receipts must use the fields required by `AGENTS.md`.