Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Maintain an advisory decision-support layer for signal fusion, validation, and operator interpretation.
Maintain or extend the advisory decision-support layer that structures signal fusion, external context, AI validation, probabilistic edge, pipeline stage, and supervisor readiness without changing execution behavior. Use when working in app/decision_support.py, journaled decision-support payloads, or operator-facing decision interpretation.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
# Decision Support ## Binding sources - **`docs/FINAL_SYSTEM_VISION.md`** — **Layer 5** (AI support); feeds structured context for LLM confirm/recommend, **not** sole execution authority. - **`AGENTS.md`** — advisory only; **L7** unchanged; decisions must stay **traceable** in payloads and journals. ## Purpose Use this skill to keep the repository's advisory decision-support layer coherent, structured, and operator-readable. In `docs/FINAL_SYSTEM_VISION.md`, structured decision context feeds **Layer 5 (AI support)** and observability; this code path must remain **advisory** per `AGENTS.md`. This layer exists to explain decisions, waits, blocks, and safe-operational readiness. It is not a trading engine and it must not become one by accident. ## Use When Use this skill when: - editing `app/decision_support.py` - editing `app/decision_support_analytics.py` - editing `app/external_context/*` - standardizing advisory provider interfaces for manual/news/social/calendar context inputs - extending `decision_support` payloads in journaling or reporting - surfacing decision-support fields in the operator panel - deriving journal-based decision-support analytics or stability views - improving human-readable labels around fusion, edge, validation, or supervisor state - extending passive learning-readiness or AI-readiness summaries derived from journaled decision-support traces - keeping `learning_snapshot` and `ai_audit` records clearly separated from runtime trading decisions ## Do Not Use When Do not use this skill for: - changing strategy actions - changing scorer thresholds or weights - changing hard risk policy - auto-enabling AI or experiments - adding fake predictive claims or guaranteed-edge language ## Safety Contract - Decision support remains advisory only. - Hard risk, confidence gates, and execution adapters remain authoritative. - AI stays a validation or interpretation layer, not an uncontrolled trader. - External context ingestion must degrade safely when absent or invalid. - External context may enrich explainability and analytics, but it must never trigger or veto execution by itself. - Provider stacks or source adapters for external context must fail safely to empty and keep the same advisory-only boundary. - Freshness, expiry, and provider-health fields for external context may be surfaced for operator review, but they must remain descriptive only. - AI validation may become context-aware for advisory summaries, but it must not become an execution path, risk override, or order generator. - Passive learning-readiness fields may summarize snapshot quality, label coverage, or shadow insight availability, but they must not enable runtime learning by themselves. - Passive AI-readiness fields may summarize audit structure, reason coverage, or evidence usefulness, but they must not activate AI runtime authority. - Probabilistic edge fields must be labeled clearly if heuristic or uncalibrated. - Journal-derived edge calibration must remain passive evidence only and must never mutate runtime behavior. - Passive market regime classification may enrich summaries and future evidence review, but it must not alter scoring, risk, or execution behavior. - Regime-aware evidence breakdowns must stay descriptive and review-oriented; they must not become promotion logic or runtime gating unless a later task adds that explicitly. - Mode-aware regime comparison must stay an experiment-review aid only and must not alter baseline, experiment, or scoped-trial execution behavior by itself. ## Primary Workflow 1. Read `AGENTS.md`. 2. Inspect the current pipeline boundary that produces or consumes decision-support metadata. 3. Reuse existing journal, dashboard, and operator-panel payloads where possible. 4. Prefer stable, short field names and operator-readable summaries. 5. Prefer journal-derived normalization over runtime rewrites when adding operator analytics. 6. Verify the new layer did not change execution behavior. ## Required Checks - `signal_fusion`, `external_context`, `ai_validation`, `probabilistic_edge`, `pipeline`, and `supervisor` stay logically distinct. - No new field implies trade approval that the backend does not perform. - Operator-facing labels are short, human-readable, and low-noise. - Missing context files or skipped AI calls still produce safe, interpretable output. - External signals remain optional and must not change execution behavior when empty, invalid, or stale. - Provider-stack extensions must keep local-file behavior intact while making future source additions explicit and bounded. - Supervisor readiness stays advisory unless a later task explicitly adds controlled gating. ## Expected Output - `Decision Support:` what changed in the advisory layer. - `Operator Surface:` how it is shown without adding noise. - `Decision Analytics:` what became measurable over time. - `Safety Check:` explicit note that execution behavior did not change.