SECURITY REVIEW
Not yet assessed
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
Review the original instructions and requested permissions before installing.
No security review is available for this catalog entry yet.
How clearly the skill guides your agent, how complete its workflow is, and how you can check the outcome.
No quality assessment is available for this catalog entry yet.
Original instructions from the publisher’s SKILL.md
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. **Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root. **Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes. **Steps** 1. **Select the change** If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise: - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change - Auto-select if only one active change exists - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to let the user select Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:apply <other>`). 2. **Check status to understand the schema** ```bash openspec status --change "<name>" --json ``` Parse the JSON to understand: - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven") - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others) 3. **Get apply instructions** ```bash openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json ``` This returns: - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs) - Progress (total, complete, remaining) - Task list with status - Dynamic instruction based on current state **Handle states:** - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change - If `state: "all_done"`: remind Human acceptance, then gstack `/review`, then archive. Do not declare Human acceptance. - Otherwise: proceed to implementation 4. **Read context files** Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used: - spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks, plus `manual-checklist.md` when present - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output 5. **Show current progress** Display: - Schema being used - Progress: "N/M tasks complete" - Remaining tasks overview - Dynamic instruction from CLI 6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)** For each pending task: - Show which task is being worked on - Make the code changes required - Keep changes minimal and focused - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]` - Continue to next task **Pause if:** - Task is unclear → ask for clarification - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance - User interrupts 7. **On completion or pause, show status** Display: - Tasks completed this session - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete" - If all done: remind Human acceptance → `/review` → archive. Do not self-accept. - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance **Output During Implementation** ``` ## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>) Working on task 3/7: <task description> [...implementation happening...] ✓ Task complete Working on task 4/7: <task description> [...implementation happening...] ✓ Task complete ``` **Output On Completion** ``` ## Implementation Complete **Change:** <change-name> **Schema:** <schema-name> **Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓ ### Completed This Session - [x] Task 1 - [x] Task 2 ... All tasks complete. Next: Human acceptance (walk the User stories), then gstack `/review`, then archive. Do not treat this as Human acceptance. ``` **Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)** ``` ## Implementation Paused **Change:** <change-name> **Schema:** <schema-name> **Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete ### Issue Encountered <description of the issue> **Options:** 1. <option 1> 2. <option 2> 3. Other approach What would you like to do? ``` **Guardrails** - Keep going through tasks until done or blocked - Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output) - If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing - If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates - Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task - Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task - Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess - Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names - If `proposal.md` has User stories and `manual-checklist.md` is missing, write it (Status: Not run). Never tick stories as passed. - Do not claim Human acceptance. Chat is not walking a User story. **Fluid Workflow Integration** This skill supports the "actions on a change" model: - **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions - **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly